Forensic anthropology is seeing recent advancements and trends in sex estimation.

Ms. Amrita Vijayan

Department of Forensic Science

Kalinga University Naya Raipur

The estimation of sex is a vital component in the identification process in forensic anthropology. The forensic anthropologist may estimate biological sex estimates exclusively from bone morphological traits when skeletal remains are present and analysis of soft tissue or DNA is impractical. Improved techniques, problem-solving, and technical progress have guided research efforts to enhance the accuracy and effectiveness of sex estimation. 1. Traditional Methods for Determining Sex Forensic anthropologists have traditionally focused on sexually dimorphic traits in skeletons, since the pelvis as well as skull exhibit the most significant differences between males and females. Pelvic Anatomy: The pelvis, modified for female parturition, is perhaps the most sexually multifaceted component of the skeleton. The sacrum, subpubic angle, and pelvic inlet are among the features that were noted. When utilized on well-preserved specimens, these traits may determine sex with a high level of accuracy, often surpassing 90%. Male individuals frequently have more prominent traits, such as larger mastoid processes, denser brow ridges, and more conspicuous external occipital protuberances. Cranial morphology demonstrates significant sexual dimorphism. Because male and female skulls share cranial features, these traits are often less reliable than those of the pelvis, despite their benefits. While these conventional methods may yield findings, the condition of the bones often limits their ability to preserve sexually dimorphic traits. To overcome these limitations, modern forensic anthropologists are currently focusing on more advanced, quantitative techniques. Two Advanced Quantitative Techniques Owing to individual variability and insufficient preservation, researchers have developed more complex, quantitative methodologies based on measurements. Metric Methodologies: Metrics utilize statistical techniques to ascertain sex and quantify bone size. Multivariate approaches, like as discriminant function analysis, employ several variances related to skeleton traits to improve results. A DFA model calculates a variety of measurements for several bones, such as the tibia, humerus, and femur. It has been shown that femoral measurements enhance sex determination, especially in cases where there is insufficient pelvic or cranial preservation, according to research. Geometric Morphometrics: The use of geometric morphometrics, an approach to forensic anthropology that goes beyond linear measurements to emphasize the form aspects of skeletal landmarks, is a recent development. This approach facilitates the examination of morphological variation, hence enhancing the accuracy of sex determination. Geometric morphometrics has been proven to be effective in improving the accuracy of sex determination, particularly in populations with minor sexual dimorphism, through the analysis of the pelvis, cranium, and other skeletal elements by researchers. 3. What role do molecular methods and DNA play? DNA analysis has emerged as a crucial tool for forensic identification, demonstrating its reliability in sex determination. Classifying chromosomes according to their XX or XY alleles allows for simple and definitive sex separation. However, in some cases, especially with old or poorly stored samples, genetic material degradation or contamination can make DNA analysis difficult.

Analysis of Mitochondrial DNA and Y-Chromosomes: If nuclear DNA is not available, Y-chromosome analysis or mitochondrial DNA may be used. Although mtDNA is effective for tracing maternal lineage, it is incapable of independently determining sex. Y-chromosome markers are exclusively present in males, indicating male sex in individuals when other DNA sources are unavailable (Jobling & Gill, 2004). Ongoing research is optimizing these methodologies to improve their effectiveness, particularly in degraded samples. 4. Advanced Technologies in Sexual Dimorphism Estimation New forensic anthropology sex estimation tools improve residual data interpretation by increasing accuracy and diversity. The advancement of 3D printing and imaging technologies has allowed forensic anthropologists to create detailed digital replicas of bones. The clarity of the dimorphic features used for sex determination is improved by looking at the models from a variety of perspectives. Furthermore, in cultures lacking skeletal collections, teaching and testing procedures for sex determination have used 3D-printed bone replicas.

Machine learning and artificial intelligence: Artificial intelligence and machine learning are increasingly being used in forensic anthropology. To develop algorithms that human evaluators might miss as skeletal dimorphism patterns, researchers mine massive databases of skeletal measurements. Researchers are utilizing AI-driven algorithms to develop an automated sex estimation system, potentially enhancing efficiency and accuracy in complex scenarios. Micro-Computed Tomography Imaging: Microcomputed tomography (CT) scanning is another advanced technique used in sex estimation studies. This technique creates detailed microscopic images of bones, revealing internal characteristics that might indicate sexual dimorphism. It has great potential in situations when traditional methods are inadequate, especially where there is incompleteness or fragmentation. The study focuses on the specified population. Demographics There is a trend in forensic anthropology toward group-specific sex estimation methods. The traits used to distinguish sex vary considerably among geographic regions and ethnicities, complicating the use of generalized models. Customized Estimation Models: Researchers have commenced the creation of sex estimate models tailored for certain populations, taking into account the differences in skeletal traits among various ethnic groups. Studies suggest that employing region-specific data to create discriminant function models may improve the precision of sex estimate. This idea is especially relevant in forensic contexts involving individuals from many cultures, when a universal paradigm may be ineffective.

Sex Estimation for Non-Western Demographics in Forensic Anthropology:

Even though much of the study has focused on North American or European people, models that are applicable to non-Western groups are becoming more and more important. Understanding how sex is represented in the skeletal remains of people from various nations, such as those from Asia, Africa, or indigenous populations, may increase the accuracy of forensic identification globally.

Considering the Law and Ethics

The techniques for sex estimation encompass ethical and legal considerations. Forensic anthropologists must continually use caution when diagnosing sex, particularly when considering cultural, gender, and identity issues. Because of the serious consequences that might arise from misidentification, forensic anthropologists must be careful when publishing data that does not accurately reflect the complexities of human sex and gender. Conclusive Evaluation Although sex estimation is already an important part of forensic anthropology, new methods and technologies could make it even more precise and useful in the future.

References

1. Buikstra, J. E., & Ubelaker, D. H. (1994). Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains. Arkansas Archeological Survey.
2. Jobling, M. A., & Gill, P. (2004). “The Forensic Analysis of DNA.” Forensic Science International, 146(1), 1-6.
3. Kimmerle, E. H., et al. (2008). “Sex Estimation from the Human Pelvis: A Comparative Study of Four Methods.” Journal of Forensic Sciences, 53(5), 1073-1079.
4. Klein, L., et al. (2018). “The Use of 3D Printing and Imaging in Forensic Anthropology.” Journal of Forensic Sciences, 63(4), 1120-1125.
5. Nishida, H., et al. (2020). “Sex Estimation of Skeletal Remains in Japanese Populations.” International Journal of Legal Medicine, 134(2), 407-415.
6. Ousley, S. D., & Jantz, R. L. (2005). “Sex Estimation Using Metric and Nonmetric Traits of the Human Skeleton.” Forensic Science International, 151(2-3), 146-153.
7. Ruff, C. B. (2018). “Sexual Dimorphism in Human Skeletal Remains.” Forensic Anthropology, 4(1), 35-44.
8. Smith, C. J., et al. (2020). “Machine Learning in Forensic Anthropology: New Directions in Sex Estimation.” Forensic Science Review, 32(2), 22-31.
9. Stewart, T. D. (1979). Essentials of Forensic Anthropology. Charles C Thomas.