Impact of Terrorist Attacks on Indian Industry and Economy Since 1947: An Analytical Overview

¹Dr Praveen Kumar Yadaw

¹Department of Electrical Engineering, Kalinga University

Since the partition of India in 1947, India and its neighbouring country have experienced a complex and often tense relationship. One significant aspect of this relationship has been the occurrence of terrorist attacks on Indian soil perpetrated by individuals or groups with connections to nearby countries. This article aims to provide an analytical overview of these attacks, examining the trends, patterns, and implications on the Indian Economy and resource utilization.

Terrorist attacks have significant economic and industrial repercussions on nations, affecting not only human lives but also infrastructure, business operations, and investor confidence. In the context of India, a country with a burgeoning economy and a growing industrial sector, the impact of terrorist attacks is multifaceted and long-lasting. This study examines the economic and industrial effects of terrorist attacks on India, analyzing disruptions in trade, investments, tourism, and manufacturing sectors. The research reveals that terrorist activities lead to reduced foreign investments due to heightened risk perceptions, decline in tourism revenues owing to safety concerns, and disruptions in supply chains affecting industrial output. Moreover, increased defense and security expenditures divert public funds from developmental projects, hindering economic growth and exacerbating fiscal deficits. The study underscores the importance of proactive counter-terrorism measures and resilient economic policies to mitigate the adverse effects of terrorist attacks on India’s economy and industrial development.

Historical Background

India has been grappling with terrorism for several decades, with the roots of terrorist activities tracing back to various separatist movements, religious extremism, and geopolitical conflicts. One of the earliest and most significant instances was the Punjab insurgency in the 1980s and early 1990s, primarily driven by demands for an independent Sikh state, Khalistan. The violence and instability during this period severely impacted Punjab’s economy, hindering investment and industrial growth in the region (Singh, 1999).

In the late 20th century, India witnessed a surge in terrorist activities, particularly in the state of Jammu and Kashmir, fueled by cross-border infiltration and religious extremism. The ongoing conflict in Kashmir has not only resulted in loss of lives but also created an environment of uncertainty, deterring both domestic and foreign investors (Chari, Cheema, & Cohen, 2007).

The Mumbai terror attacks in 2008 marked a watershed moment in India’s fight against terrorism, with ten coordinated shooting and bombing attacks across the city by Neighbour country  militants. The attacks resulted in significant human casualties and caused substantial damage to the city’s commercial and hospitality sectors. The event sent shockwaves across the global investor community, leading to a temporary decline in foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows into India (Sinha & Srinivasan, 2013).

Subsequent terrorist incidents, such as the Pathankot and Uri attacks in 2016, further heightened security concerns and strained India-Neighbour country  relations. These incidents have had a chilling effect on bilateral trade relations and regional economic cooperation, with increased border tensions leading to disruptions in cross-border trade and transport (Pant, 2017).

Terrorist attacks in India have often resulted in short-term volatility and negative sentiment in the country’s share markets. Investors typically react negatively to such incidents due to heightened uncertainty and risk perceptions associated with the affected sectors and the broader economy.

For instance, following the Mumbai terror attacks in November 2008, the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) Sensex, India’s benchmark stock index, witnessed a sharp decline. Within two days of the attack, the Sensex fell by approximately 10%, reflecting investor concerns about the potential economic impact and heightened geopolitical risks (Kumar & Singh, 2010).

Similarly, terrorist incidents in 2016, such as the Pathankot and Uri attacks, also led to short-term volatility in the Indian stock markets. The Sensex and Nifty indices experienced fluctuations, with investors adopting a cautious approach amidst escalating tensions and uncertainty (Dhar & Paul, 2017).

1. Kashmir Conflict (1989 – Present): The insurgency in Jammu and Kashmir, which began in 1989, has seen numerous terrorist attacks perpetrated by groups based in neighbour country. This conflict has resulted in thousands of casualties over the decades.
2. Mumbai Attacks (2008): One of the most devastating terrorist attacks in India’s history, the Mumbai attacks saw 10 terrorists from neighbour country -based militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba carry out coordinated attacks across the city, killing 166 people and injuring hundreds more.
3. Parliament Attack (2001): A group of armed militants attacked the Indian Parliament in New Delhi. The attack, which was attributed to neighbour country -based Jaish-e-Mohammed, led to the deaths of 14 people, including the five attackers.
4. Pathankot Attack (2016): Militants from neighbour country launched an attack on the Pathankot Air Force Station in Punjab. The attack resulted in the deaths of seven security personnel and four militants.
5. Pulwama Attack (2019): A suicide bomber affiliated with Jaish-e-Mohammed attacked a convoy of Indian paramilitary personnel in Pulwama, Kashmir, killing 40 CRPF personnel and injuring many others.
6. Uri Attack (2016): Four heavily armed militants attacked an Indian Army brigade headquarters in Uri, Kashmir. The attack led to the deaths of 19 soldiers and all four militants.
7. Akshardham Temple Attack (2002): Two gunmen attacked the Akshardham Temple complex in Gujarat, killing 30 people and injuring more than 80. The attack was linked to neighbour country -based terrorist group Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed.
8. Mumbai Train Bombings (2006): Seven coordinated bomb blasts on Mumbai’s suburban railway killed 209 people and injured over 700. The attack was carried out by the Lashkar-e-Taiba in collaboration with the Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI).
9. Gurdaspur Attack (2015): A group of militants attacked a police station in Gurdaspur district of Punjab, killing seven people, including four policemen. The attackers were believed to have crossed over from neighbour country.
10. Kargil Conflict (1999): While not a terrorist attack in the conventional sense, the Kargil conflict between India and neighbour country saw Neighbour country soldiers and militants infiltrate into Indian territory in the Kargil district of Jammu and Kashmir. The conflict resulted in numerous casualties on both sides before a ceasefire was declared.

The partition of British India in 1947 led to the creation of two independent states: India and neighbour country. This monumental event was accompanied by widespread violence and displacement, setting the stage for decades of strained relations between the two nations.

Data Analysis

To understand the scale and impact of terrorist attacks by neighbour country nationals on India, we have analyzed data spanning from 1947 to the present day. The data includes various types of attacks, such as bombings, shootings, and suicide attacks, along with the number of casualties.

Frequency of Attacks

Our analysis reveals that there has been a fluctuating pattern in the frequency of terrorist attacks by Neighbour country nationals on Indian soil over the years. The 1980s and 1990s saw a significant increase in the number of attacks, particularly during periods of heightened political tension between the two countries. However, there has been a gradual decline in the frequency of attacks in the 21st century, with occasional spikes during periods of increased geopolitical tension.

Types of Attacks

The data also highlights the diversity in the types of attacks carried out by Neighbour country nationals. While bombings have been the most common form of attack, there have also been instances of shootings, suicide bombings, and hostage situations. This diversity in attack methods underscores the adaptability and evolving tactics of terrorist groups operating in the region.

Casualties

Perhaps the most sobering aspect of our analysis is the human cost of these attacks. Thousands of innocent civilians and security personnel have lost their lives in these senseless acts of violence. The impact of these attacks extends far beyond the immediate victims, affecting families, communities, and the broader national psyche.

Implications and Consequences

Some of the incidence where international media quoted the involvement of Neighbour country Nationals in terrorist attack on India

1. Mumbai Attacks (2008)

• BBC News. “Mumbai attacks: What happened.” BBC News, 26 November 2009.
• This report details the involvement of Neighbour country -based militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba in the Mumbai attacks and the links to Neighbour country ‘s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI).

2. Parliament Attack (2001)

• The Guardian. “Attack on Indian parliament.” The Guardian, 13 December 2001.
• The article discusses the connection between the Jaish-e-Mohammed militant group, based in Neighbour country , and the attack on the Indian Parliament.

3. Pathankot Attack (2016)

• The Indian Express. “Pathankot terror attack: What happened and the aftermath.” The Indian Express, 6 January 2016.
• The report highlights the alleged involvement of Neighbour country -based militant group Jaish-e-Mohammed in the Pathankot attack.

4. Pulwama Attack (2019)

• Al Jazeera. “India’s Pulwama attack: All the latest updates.” Al Jazeera, 15 February 2019.
• The article mentions the responsibility claimed by Neighbour country -based militant group Jaish-e-Mohammed for the Pulwama attack.

5. Uri Attack (2016)

• Times of India. “Uri terror attack: All you need to know.” Times of India, 19 September 2016.
• The report discusses the Indian government’s assertion of Neighbour country ‘s involvement in the Uri attack, linking it to Neighbour country -based militants.

6. Akshardham Temple Attack (2002)

• BBC News. “Gunmen attack Delhi temple.” BBC News, 25 September 2002.
• The article mentions the Indian government’s claim of the involvement of Neighbour country -based militant groups Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed in the Akshardham Temple attack.

7. Mumbai Train Bombings (2006)

• Reuters. “Mumbai train blasts: All you need to know.” Reuters, 12 July 2006.
• The report discusses the alleged involvement of Neighbour country -based militant groups Lashkar-e-Taiba and Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) in the Mumbai train bombings.

The persistent threat of terrorist attacks has had profound implications for both India and Neighbour country . For India, these attacks have reinforced the need for robust counter-terrorism measures and heightened border security. It has also fueled public sentiment against Neighbour country , often leading to calls for punitive action.

On the other hand, Neighbour country  has been under increasing international pressure to dismantle terrorist networks operating on its soil and to take decisive action against those responsible for cross-border attacks. The failure to do so has strained Neighbour country ‘s relations with the international community, leading to diplomatic isolation and economic sanctions.

Conclusion

The history of terrorist attacks on India by Neighbour country nationals is a grim reminder of the complex and fraught relationship between the neighbouring countries. While there have been periods of relative calm, the threat of terrorism continues to loom large, casting a shadow over prospects for lasting peace and stability in the region.

Both countries must recognize the shared responsibility to combat terrorism and work towards resolving their differences through dialogue and diplomatic channels. Only through concerted efforts and mutual cooperation can they hope to break the cycle of violence and build a more peaceful and prosperous future for their people.

Reference

Article Reference

1. Kashmir Conflict (1989 – Present)

• BBC News. “Kashmir: The conflict explained.” BBC News, 10 August 2019.

2. Mumbai Attacks (2008)

• BBC News. “Mumbai attacks: What happened.” BBC News, 26 November 2009.

3. Parliament Attack (2001)

• The Guardian. “Attack on Indian parliament.” The Guardian, 13 December 2001.

4. Pathankot Attack (2016)

• The Indian Express. “Pathankot terror attack: What happened and the aftermath.” The Indian Express, 6 January 2016.

5. Pulwama Attack (2019)

• Al Jazeera. “India’s Pulwama attack: All the latest updates.” Al Jazeera, 15 February 2019.

6. Uri Attack (2016)

• Times of India. “Uri terror attack: All you need to know.” Times of India, 19 September 2016.

7. Akshardham Temple Attack (2002)

• BBC News. “Gunmen attack Delhi temple.” BBC News, 25 September 2002.

8. Mumbai Train Bombings (2006)

• Reuters. “Mumbai train blasts: All you need to know.” Reuters, 12 July 2006.

9. Gurdaspur Attack (2015)

• Hindustan Times. “Gurdaspur terror attack: A timeline.” Hindustan Times, 27 July 2015.

10. Kargil Conflict (1999)

• BBC News. “Kargil conflict: A timeline.” BBC News, 26 July 1999.

Journal Reference

1. Singh, P. (1999). The Politics of Punjab: A Historical Analysis. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
2. Chari, P. R., Cheema, P. I., & Cohen, S. P. (2007). Four Crises and a Peace Process: American Engagement in South Asia. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
3. Sinha, A., & Srinivasan, T. N. (2013). Foreign Direct Investment in India: Policies, Proposals, and Prospects. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(26/27), 53-59.
4. Pant, H. V. (2017). India’s Contemporary Security Challenges. New Delhi: Routledge India.
5. Kumar, A., & Singh, H. (2010). Impact of Mumbai Terror Attacks on Stock Market: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Management Research and Reviews, 1(2), 84-91.
6. Dhar, B., & Paul, S. (2017). Terrorism and Stock Market Volatility: An Empirical Analysis of Indian Market. Journal of Economic Policy and Research, 12(1), 45-56.