Unfolding Beauty: The Evolutionary Journey of Butterfly Wing Patterns

Name- Miss Lipsa Dash
Assistant professor
Department of Zoology
Abstract
Butterfly wing patterns have long piqued researchers’ and fans’ interest, providing as a one-ofa-kind canvas for pursuing the research in evolutionary processes. This paper has gained
immaculate responses with respect to the recent developments in understanding the various
butterfly’s wing patterns, sheds insight on the underlying mechanics, and points the way
forward for further research. The researchers used an interdisciplinary approach that included
molecular genetics, morphological analysis, and environmental variables. The introduction
provides a brief historical context and the current state of knowledge on butterfly wing patterns,
so as to try hard to bridge the gap between the two. To give a comprehensive review of the
reasons causing wing pattern variation, the study employs unique approaches in genetic
analysis and morphometric studies. The findings give a comprehensive understanding of how
genetic factors, environmental influences, and selection pressures interact to form the diverse
mosaic of wing patterns found in many butterfly species. The discussion delves into the
implications of these observations, emphasizing how the revealed diversification patterns add
to our understanding of butterfly evolution as a whole. Limitations are acknowledged, and
potential research avenues are provided, encouraging the future analysis of the same. Overall,
“The myriad of fancy patterning and it’s evolution” is a significant step forward in resolving
the mysteries of the formation of these interesting insects.
Keywords Butterfly, Wing-pattern, Evolution
1. Introduction to Butterfly Wing Patterns
It’s difficult to talk about the butterflies and the moths without mentioning their impeccable
beauty in their diversity. The over 137,000 Lepidoptera species known (Beccaloni et al., 2003)
display a dizzying assortment of forms, sizes, colours, life cycles, and behaviours. Butterfly
colour patterns are not the same as leopard and zebra colour patterns. Leopard and zebra colour
patterns are composed of spots and stripes that vary in number and location from person to
person and are ordered either randomly or evenly. These coat patterns’ unpredictability and
distinctiveness are analogous to human fingerprint ridge patterns. In contrast, all individuals of
the same butterfly species have the same spot or stripe at the same area. More crucially, a
particular spot or stripe may be traced from species to species within a genus and, in many
cases, from genus to genus within a family. Natural and sexual selection both modify the
embryonic genetic programming that governs the fate of wing scales, resulting in intricate
mosaics that may both warn predators and blend in perfectly with their environment (Mayr,
1970).
A butterfly’s wing pattern is an anatomical system that is as complicated and diverse as the
vertebrate skeleton and arthropod body segmentation and stigmatization (Hughes & Kaufman,
2002). It’s a homologous system that may be used to study the origins, adaptability, and variety
of developmental and evolutionary processes.
Wing pattern changes may be used to identify nearly all of the 12,000 known butterfly species
(Nijhout 1991). Despite this baffling variation, scientists are continuously revealing the
genetic, developmental, and evolutionary roots of butterfly wing patterns (Penz &
Mohammadi, 2013). Quantitative genetic and molecular developmental research is shedding
light on the origins of butterfly wing patterns (Saenko et. al., 2008).
Recent advances in genetic analysis and imaging technologies have opened up new avenues
for researchers to examine the molecular mechanisms that underpin the creation of these
complicated patterns (de Boer et. al., 2022). Furthermore, our understanding of wing pattern
creation is limited by factors such as predation, mimicry, and habitat change in butterflies.
This paper seeks to review recent discoveries in the topic of butterfly wing pattern evolution,
providing a complete overview of current knowledge. The review intends to add to our better
understanding of the delicate dance between genes and the environment that results in the
breath-taking diversity of butterfly wing patterns observed in nature by studying the principles
driving wing pattern development. We are on a journey to discover the basic principles guiding
the development of life’s visual wonders as we examine the secrets behind these captivating
patterns.
2. The Science Behind Butterfly Wing Pattern
Butterfly wing patterns science is an intriguing investigation into the complicated physics that
underpins the birth and development of these amazing structures. Butterflies’ wing designs,
like those of other colourful insects, have purposes other than aesthetics. This phenomenon is
influenced by genetics, development, and the environment in which these animals live (Boggs
et. al., 2003).
2.1. Genetics
Genetics has played a substantial part in butterfly wing pattern science. The genetic code in a
butterfly’s DNA contains instructions for wing growth, including scale arrangement, colours,
and structural components (Matsuoka & Monteiro, 2018). Mutations in these genes can cause
changes in wing patterns, adding to the remarkable diversity found across butterfly species
(McMillan et. al., 2002). Understanding the genetic basis of wing patterns requires
understanding the complicated links between several genes and regulatory networks.
2.2. Developmental Biology
The technique of creating butterfly wings is well-designed. During the pupal stage, cells grow
and move, resulting in stunning patterns. Pigments and structural components are formed by
signalling cascades and molecular interactions (Othmer et. al., 2009). The study of
developmental biology illuminates how these patterns alter over time, revealing the molecular
dance that results in the final wing architecture.
2.3. Ecology and adaptation
Butterfly wing patterns are studied in both natural and lab environments. Wing patterns provide
important ecological services in addition to being aesthetically pleasing (Kunz et. al., 2011).
Butterflies use mimicry, camouflage, and warning signs to traverse their environment and
communicate with other species (Forbes 2011). Understanding the biological environment
allows scientists to evaluate the adaptive value of various wing patterns, demonstrating how
they aid butterfly survival and reproduction.
3. Historical Overview of Butterfly Wing Patterns
A historical look into butterfly wing patterns will take you on a fascinating trip through
centuries of observation, curiosity, and scientific discovery. While the exquisite designs on
butterfly wings have fascinated mankind for millennia, scientific research into these patterns
has advanced throughout time.
3.1. Ancient Observations
Butterfly wing patterns captivated ancient cultures and were frequently depicted in art and
mythology (Kritsky & Cherry 2000). In ancient Egypt, Greece, and Rome, butterflies were
associated with the soul and transformation. Early observations of their vibrant colours and
intricate wing patterns were captivating, but scientific information was limited (Srinivasarao
1999).
3.2. Emergence of Entomology
In the 18th and 19th centuries, entomology arose as a distinct scientific field. Naturalists such
as Carl Linnaeus categorized butterflies according to their physical qualities, such as wing
patterns (Feltwell 2012). The development of microscopy enabled closer observation of scales
and pigments, paving the path for further in-depth research.
3.3. Genetics and Modern Advances
The twentieth century witnessed the application of genetics to study butterfly wing patterns. H.
B. D. Kettlewell’s (1961) research on industrial melanism in peppered moths established a
fundamental example of how variation in genetic make up could impact the wing colour.
Advances in molecular biology in the later twentieth century enabled scientists to dive deeper
into the genetic makeup of wing patterning (Zhang et. al., 2019).
3.4. Contemporary Exploration
In recent decades, technological advancements in imaging, genetics, and computational
biology have produced fresh chances for researching butterfly wing patterns. Researchers may
now look into the complex genetic networks and phases of development that result in many
patterns found in animals (Levine & Davidson 2005). The study of ecology, behaviour, and
evolution has helped us better grasp the functional usefulness of butterfly wing patterns in
nature (Le Roy et. al., 2019).
4. Evolutionary Changes in Butterfly Wing Patterns
The emergence of butterfly wing patterns is a fascinating story of adaptation, natural selection,
and the dynamic interaction of genetic variation with environmental constraints. Butterflies’
wing designs have evolved considerably over time, resulting in a wide variety of patterns
observed among species (Le Roy et. al., 2019).
4.1. Adaptive Camouflage
Adaptive camouflage is a major source of evolutionary variation in butterfly wing patterns
(Suzuki et. al., 2019). Butterflies have evolved patterns over generations that allow them to
blend in with their surroundings, offering them a survival advantage by reducing their
vulnerability to predators (Boggs et. al., 2003). This versatility is particularly obvious in
animals that dwell in a wide range of settings, from forest floors to meadows.
4.2. Mimicry
Butterfly wing patterns evolve through mimicry, a process in which butterflies acquire patterns
resembling other creatures in order to obtain protection or advantages (Deshmukh et. al., 2018).
Batesian mimicry, for example, happens when a harmless species develops to resemble a
poisonous or unpleasant species, providing protection from predators who mistake them for
the hazardous model.
4.3. Sexual Selection
Many butterfly species use wing patterns for sexual selection. Males frequently show intricate
and vibrant designs to attract mates, whilst females may adopt more cryptic patterns to enhance
their chances of reproduction (Davies et. al., 2012). Sexual selection can foster the complexities
and visually appealing wing patterns, enhancing the species’ pattern diversity (Oliver et. al.,
2009).
4.4. Genetic Mutations
Random genetic mutations is a prima facie in the evolution of butterfly wing patterns (Nijhout
2001). Mutations in the genes that govern wing development and colour can produce different
patterns, offering material for natural selection to work with (McMillan et. al., 2002). Some
mutations may provide a selection advantage, allowing them to persist and spread throughout
a population over time.
5. Factors Impacting the orchestration of Butterfly Wing Pattern
Butterfly wing patterns evolve in a multidimensional manner, influenced by genetic,
ecological, and selection variables (Outomuro et. al., 2013). The exquisite patterns on the wings
of butterflies are not random; they have acclimatised with the environmental difficulties,
predation stressors, and reproductive dynamics (Boggs et. al., 2003).
5.1. Natural Selection
Natural selection is the primary driver of wing pattern creation. Butterflies with wing patterns
that help them survive and reproduce in a certain habitat are more likely to pass on their genes
to future generations (Gilbert & Singer 1975). Natural selection promotes adaptations that
enable effective concealment, imitation, and warning signals.
5.2. Sexual Selection
Sexual selection promotes the evolution of dazzling and visually appealing wing patterns,
particularly in males (Stevens 2005). Females may choose mates with certain wing traits,
resulting in intricate patterns in response to mating (Jennions & Petrie 1997). This is
responsible for the development of unique and complex displays within a species.
5.3. Mimicry and Camouflage
Mimicry and camouflage are critical to butterfly survival. Mimicry is the process of developing
patterns that mimic other creatures so as to defend against predators (Jamie 2017). Camouflage,
on the other hand, helps butterflies to blend in with their environment, lowering their chances
of detection by predators (Stevens & Ruxton 2019). Predator-induced selection mechanisms
often drive the evolution of these deceptive wing morphologies (Humphreys & Ruxton 2018).
5.4. Climate Change
Changes in global environmental conditions, such as climate patterns, can influence the
development of butterfly wing patterns (Buckley & Kingsolver 2019). Temperature,
precipitation, and habitat dispersion may all have an impact on the predominance of different
wing patterns as butterflies adjust to changing environmental circumstances (Bonebrake et. al.,
2010).
6. Variations in Butterfly Wing Patterns
Butterfly wing patterns highlight the enormous diversity of this insect group. Butterfly wings
are covered with a diverse array of colours, shapes, and complex motifs, revealing a rich
tapestry of evolutionary flexibility (Ball 2009).
6.1. Species- specific Variation
Butterfly species are identified by their distinctive wing patterns (Nijhout 2001). These traits
are commonly used as the primary diagnostic indications for taxonomy categorization. From
the bright and elaborate patterns of tropical species to the more muted and cryptic designs of
temperate butterflies, each species adds to the richness of butterfly life (Kricher 1997).
6.2. Seasonal Dimorphism
Some butterfly species exhibit seasonal variations in their wing patterns. Temperature,
sunshine length, and other environmental factors all impact seasonal dimorphism (Gilchrist
1990). The variety of wing patterns might have a specific purpose, like as thermoregulation or
adaptation to the various floral resources available over the season (Kingsolver & Watt 1983).
6.3.Sexual Dimorphism
Sexual dimorphism in wing patterns refers to the variations between men and females of the
same species (Berns 2013). Males usually display more colourful and elaborate patterns, which
aid in courting and mate attractiveness (Silberglied 1984). Females, on the other hand, may
exhibit more muted behaviour in order to increase their chances of survival during egg laying
and reduce predation risks (Casacci et. al., 2019).
6.4. Mimicry and Batesian Mimicry
Mimicry happens when butterflies create wing patterns that resemble other organisms in order
to defend themselves or gain an advantage in various ecological interactions (Mallet & Gilbert
1995). Batesian mimicry is a sort of mimicry in which a harmless species adopts the look of a
harmful or unpalatable species to protect itself from predators.
7. Impact of Environmental Changes on Butterfly Wing Patterns
The impact of environmental changes on butterfly wing patterns is critical for understanding
how these interesting insects react and adapt to their environments (Hill et. al., 2021).
Environmental changes, whether natural or man-made, can influence butterfly populations’
selection variables, resulting in variances in wing patterns (Iserhard et. al., 2019).
Temperature and weather fluctuations can have an impact on the developmental systems that
determine the formation of wing patterns (Beldade et. al., 2011). Warmer temperatures may
accelerate growth, changing the size, colour, and complexity of wing patterns (Kingsolver et.
al., 2011). Climate change may also alter the distribution of butterfly species, influencing the
prevalence of specific wing patterns in various places (Cormont et. al., 2011).
Habitat loss and fragmentation disturb the natural ecosystems in which butterflies live (KaizerBonk & Nowicki 2022). This can limit the availability of appropriate host plants and have an
influence on the selection criteria that determine wing patterns. Species may struggle to adapt
to changing surroundings, influencing population diversity and wing pattern expression (True
& Haag 2001).
Urbanization and pollution pose new challenges for butterfly populations (Shnahan et. al.,
2014). Urban regions usually have higher amounts of pollution, different lighting conditions,
and less natural habitats. Butterflies in such environments may face selection pressures that
favour certain wing patterns, perhaps leading to adaptations associated with metropolitan
surroundings (Taylor- Cox et. al., 2020).
Environmental changes can disrupt butterfly life cycles, which coordinate with host plants
(Dennis et. al., 2004). If butterflies emerge when their preferred host plants become unavailable
due to phenological changes, their survival and reproductive success may suffer (Posledovich
et. al., 2015). This, in turn, may influence selection pressures on wing patterns.
Understanding how environmental changes influence butterfly wing patterns is important for
butterfly conservation. Monitoring changes in wing patterns can offer information on the health
and adaptability of butterfly populations (Satterfield & Davies 2015). Conservation efforts may
need both habitat restoration and the maintenance of adaptive ability in the face of ongoing
environmental change (Lawler 2009).
8. Future Predictions for Butterfly Wing Pattern Evolution
Predicting the future development of butterfly wing patterns entails taking into account a
variety of factors, including ongoing environmental changes, ecological interactions, and the
possible impact of human activities (Rossato et. al., 2018).
Continued climate change is predicted to have a significant impact on butterfly wing patterns
(Kingsolver & Buckley 2015). Rising temperatures and changed precipitation patterns may
affect butterfly species distribution, impacting the predominance of distinct wing patterns in
different geographic locations (Zhou et. al., 2022). Species may adapt to changing climates,
resulting in changes in colour, size, and phenology (Ovaskainen et. al., 2013).
Continuous habitat change and urbanization can have an impact on butterfly population
selection pressures (Bergerot et. al., 2011). Species that live in cities may undergo unique
stresses, perhaps leading to changes in their wing patterns (Scott 1992). Urban-adapted species
may exhibit patterns distinct from their natural equivalents (Albery et. al., 2022).
Conservation activities and human intervention, such as habitat restoration and preservation
programs, have the potential to influence butterfly wing patterns (New et. al., 1995). Strategies
for mitigating the impacts of environmental change on butterfly populations can assist to
maintain present patterns while also stimulating the emergence of novel adaptations (Parmesan
2006).
International collaboration and efforts to protect biodiversity and battle climate change may
have an impact on butterfly wing patterns in the future. Collaborative efforts to solve global
concerns and safeguard natural habitats can help to preserve butterfly variety and the
evolutionary processes that shape wing patterns (Wang et. al., 2020).
Reference
Albery, G. F., Carlson, C. J., Cohen, L. E., Eskew, E. A., Gibb, R., Ryan, S. J., … & Becker,
D. J. (2022). Urban-adapted mammal species have more known pathogens. Nature Ecology &
Evolution, 6(6), 794-801.
Ball, P. (2009). Shapes: nature’s patterns: a tapestry in three parts. OUP Oxford.
Beccaloni GW, Scoble MJ, Robinson GS, Pitkin B, eds. 2003. The Global Lepidoptera Names
Index (LepIndex). http://www.nhm.ac.uk/entomology/lepindex [Accessed April 14, 2010]
Beldade, P., Mateus, A. R. A., & Keller, R. A. (2011). Evolution and molecular mechanisms
of adaptive developmental plasticity. Molecular ecology, 20(7), 1347-1363.
Bergerot, B., Fontaine, B., Julliard, R., & Baguette, M. (2011). Landscape variables impact the
structure and composition of butterfly assemblages along an urbanization gradient. Landscape
Ecology, 26, 83-94.
Berns, C. M. (2013). The evolution of sexual dimorphism: understanding mechanisms of
sexual shape differences. Sexual dimorphism, 1-16.
Boggs, C. L., Watt, W. B., & Ehrlich, P. R. (Eds.). (2003). Butterflies: ecology and evolution
taking flight. University of Chicago Press.
Bonebrake, T. C., Ponisio, L. C., Boggs, C. L., & Ehrlich, P. R. (2010). More than just
indicators: a review of tropical butterfly ecology and conservation. Biological conservation,
143(8), 1831-1841.
Buckley, L. B., & Kingsolver, J. G. (2019). Environmental variability shapes evolution,
plasticity and biogeographic responses to climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography,
28(10), 1456-1468.
Casacci, L. P., Bonelli, S., Balletto, E., & Barbero, F. (2019). Multimodal signaling in
myrmecophilous butterflies. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 454.
Cormont, A., Malinowska, A. H., Kostenko, O., Radchuk, V., Hemerik, L., WallisDeVries, M.
F., & Verboom, J. (2011). Effect of local weather on butterfly flight behaviour, movement, and
colonization: significance for dispersal under climate change. Biodiversity and Conservation,
20, 483-503.
Davies, N. B., Krebs, J. R., & West, S. A. (2012). An introduction to behavioural ecology. John
Wiley & Sons.
de Boer, R. A., Heymans, S., Backs, J., Carrier, L., Coats, A. J., Dimmeler, S., … & Thum, T.
(2022). Targeted therapies in genetic dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathies: from
molecular mechanisms to therapeutic targets. A position paper from the Heart Failure
Association (HFA) and the Working Group on Myocardial Function of the European Society
of Cardiology (ESC). European journal of heart failure, 24(3), 406-420.
Dennis, R. L., Hodgson, J. G., Grenyer, R., Shreeve, T. G., & Roy, D. B. (2004). Host plants
and butterfly biology. Do host‐plant strategies drive butterfly status?. Ecological Entomology,
29(1), 12-26.
Deshmukh, R., Baral, S., Gandhimathi, A., Kuwalekar, M., & Kunte, K. (2018). Mimicry in
butterflies: co‐option and a bag of magnificent developmental genetic tricks. Wiley
Interdisciplinary Reviews: Developmental Biology, 7(1), e291.
Feltwell, J. (2012). Large white butterfly: the biology, biochemistry and physiology of Pieris
brassicae (Linnaeus) (Vol. 18). Springer Science & Business Media.
Forbes, P. (2011). Dazzled and deceived: mimicry and camouflage. Yale University Press.
Gilbert, L. E., & Singer, M. C. (1975). Butterfly ecology. Annual review of ecology and
systematics, 6(1), 365-395.
Gilchrist, G. W. (1990). The consequences of sexual dimorphism in body size for butterfly
flight and thermoregulation. Functional Ecology, 475-487.
Hill, G. M., Kawahara, A. Y., Daniels, J. C., Bateman, C. C., & Scheffers, B. R. (2021). Climate
change effects on animal ecology: butterflies and moths as a case study. Biological Reviews,
96(5), 2113-2126.
Hughes, C. L., & Kaufman, T. C. (2002). Hox genes and the evolution of the arthropod body
plan 1. Evolution & development, 4(6), 459-499.
Humphreys, R. K., & Ruxton, G. D. (2018). What is known and what is not yet known about
deflection of the point of a predator’s attack. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 123(3),
483-495.
Iserhard, C. A., Duarte, L., Seraphim, N., & Freitas, A. V. L. (2019). How urbanization affects
multiple dimensions of biodiversity in tropical butterfly assemblages. Biodiversity and
Conservation, 28, 621-638.
Jamie, G. A. (2017). Signals, cues and the nature of mimicry. Proceedings of the Royal Society
B: Biological Sciences, 284(1849), 20162080.
Jennions, M. D., & Petrie, M. (1997). Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a
review of causes and consequences. Biological Reviews, 72(2), 283-327.
Kajzer-Bonk, J., & Nowicki, P. (2022). Butterflies in trouble: The effectiveness of Natura 2000
network in preventing habitat loss and population declines of endangered species in urban area.
Ecological Indicators, 135, 108518.
Kettlewell, H. B. D. (1961). The phenomenon of industrial melanism in Lepidoptera. Annual
Review of Entomology, 6(1), 245-262.
Kingsolver, J. G., & Buckley, L. B. (2015). Climate variability slows evolutionary responses
of Colias butterflies to recent climate change. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological
Sciences, 282(1802), 20142470.
Kingsolver, J. G., & Watt, W. B. (1983). Thermoregulatory strategies in Colias butterflies:
thermal stress and the limits to adaptation in temporally varying environments. The American
Naturalist, 121(1), 32-55.
Kingsolver, J. G., Arthur Woods, H., Buckley, L. B., Potter, K. A., MacLean, H. J., & Higgins,
J. K. (2011). Complex life cycles and the responses of insects to climate change.
Kricher, J. C. (1997). A neotropical companion: an introduction to the animals, plants, and
ecosystems of the New World tropics. Princeton University Press.
Kritsky, G., & Cherry, R. H. (2000). Insect mythology. iUniverse.
Kunz, T. H., Braun de Torrez, E., Bauer, D., Lobova, T., & Fleming, T. H. (2011). Ecosystem
services provided by bats. Annals of the New York academy of sciences, 1223(1), 1-38.
Lawler, J. J. (2009). Climate change adaptation strategies for resource management and
conservation planning. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1162(1), 79-98.
Le Roy, C., Debat, V., & Llaurens, V. (2019). Adaptive evolution of butterfly wing shape:
from morphology to behaviour. Biological Reviews, 94(4), 1261-1281.
Levine, M., & Davidson, E. H. (2005). Gene regulatory networks for development.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(14), 4936-4942.
Mallet, J., & Gilbert Jr, L. E. (1995). Why are there so many mimicry rings? Correlations
between habitat, behaviour and mimicry in Heliconius butterflies. Biological Journal of the
Linnean Society, 55(2), 159-180.
Matsuoka, Y., & Monteiro, A. (2018). Melanin pathway genes regulate color and morphology
of butterfly wing scales. Cell reports, 24(1), 56-65.
Mayr, E. (1970). Populations, species, and evolution: an abridgment of animal species and
evolution (Vol. 19). Harvard University Press.
McMillan, W. O., Monteiro, A., & Kapan, D. D. (2002). Development and evolution on the
wing. Trends in ecology & evolution, 17(3), 125-133.
New, T. R., Pyle, R. M., Thomas, J. A., Thomas, C. D., & Hammond, P. C. (1995). Butterfly
conservation management. Annual review of entomology, 40(1), 57-83.
Nijhout, H. F. (2001). Elements of butterfly wing patterns. Journal of Experimental Zoology,
291(3), 213-225.
Nijhout, H.F. (1991) The Development and Evolution of Butterfly Wing Patterns, Smithsonian
Institution Press
Oliver, J. C., Robertson, K. A., & Monteiro, A. (2009). Accommodating natural and sexual
selection in butterfly wing pattern evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological
Sciences, 276(1666), 2369-2375.
Othmer, H. G., Painter, K., Umulis, D., & Xue, C. (2009). The intersection of theory and
application in elucidating pattern formation in developmental biology. Mathematical modelling
of natural phenomena, 4(4), 3-82.
Outomuro, D., Adams, D. C., & Johansson, F. (2013). The evolution of wing shape in
ornamented-winged damselflies (Calopterygidae, Odonata). Evolutionary biology, 40, 300-
309.
Ovaskainen, O., Skorokhodova, S., Yakovleva, M., Sukhov, A., Kutenkov, A., Kutenkova, N.,
… & Delgado, M. D. M. (2013). Community-level phenological response to climate change.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(33), 13434-13439.
Parmesan, C. (2006). Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu.
Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 37, 637-669.
Penz, C. M., & Mohammadi, N. (2013). Wing pattern diversity in Brassolini butterflies
(Nymphalidae, Satyrinae). Biota Neotropica, 13, 154-180.
Posledovich, D., Toftegaard, T., Wiklund, C., Ehrlén, J., & Gotthard, K. (2015). The
developmental race between maturing host plants and their butterfly herbivore–the influence
of phenological matching and temperature. Journal of Animal Ecology, 84(6), 1690-1699.
Rossato, D. O., Kaminski, L. A., Iserhard, C. A., & Duarte, L. (2018). More than colours: an
eco-evolutionary framework for wing shape diversity in butterflies. In Advances in Insect
Physiology (Vol. 54, pp. 55-84). Academic Press.
Saenko, S. V., French, V., Brakefield, P. M., & Beldade, P. (2008). Conserved developmental
processes and the formation of evolutionary novelties: examples from butterfly wings.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1496), 1549-
1556.
Satterfield, D. A., & Davis, A. K. (2015). Variation in wing characteristics of monarch
butterflies during migration: Earlier migrants have redder and more elongated wings. Animal
Migration, 2(1), 1-7.
Scott, J. A. (1992). The butterflies of North America: a natural history and field guide. Stanford
University Press.
Shanahan, D. F., Strohbach, M. W., Warren, P. S., & Fuller, R. A. (2014). The challenges of
urban living. Avian urban ecology, 3-20.
Silberglied, R. E. (1984). Visual communication and sexual selection among butterflies. The
biology of butterflies.
Srinivasarao, M. (1999). Nano-optics in the biological world: beetles, butterflies, birds, and
moths. Chemical reviews, 99(7), 1935-1962.
Stevens, M. (2005). The role of eyespots as anti-predator mechanisms, principally
demonstrated in the Lepidoptera. Biological Reviews, 80(4), 573-588.
Stevens, M., & Ruxton, G. D. (2019). The key role of behaviour in animal camouflage.
Biological Reviews, 94(1), 116-134.
Suzuki, T. K., Tomita, S., & Sezutsu, H. (2019). Multicomponent structures in camouflage and
mimicry in butterfly wing patterns. Journal of Morphology, 280(1), 149-166.
Taylor-Cox, E. D., Macgregor, C. J., Corthine, A., Hill, J. K., Hodgson, J. A., & Saccheri, I. J.
(2020). Wing morphological responses to latitude and colonisation in a range expanding
butterfly. PeerJ, 8, e10352.
True, J. R., & Haag, E. S. (2001). Developmental system drift and flexibility in evolutionary
trajectories. Evolution & development, 3(2), 109-119.
Wang, W. L., Suman, D. O., Zhang, H. H., Xu, Z. B., Ma, F. Z., & Hu, S. J. (2020). Butterfly
conservation in China: from science to action. Insects, 11(10), 661.
Zhang, C. X., Brisson, J. A., & Xu, H. J. (2019). Molecular mechanisms of wing polymorphism
in insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 64, 297-314.
Zhou, S., Wang, K., Messyasz, B., Xu, Y., Gao, M., Li, Y., & Wu, N. (2022). Functional and
taxonomic beta diversity of butterfly assemblages in an archipelago: relative importance of
island characteristics, climate, and spatial factors. Ecological Indicators, 142, 109191.